User Tools

Site Tools


260308natural_england_eir_request_-_tees_maintenance_dredging

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
260308natural_england_eir_request_-_tees_maintenance_dredging [2026/08/02 15:27] nefcadmin260308natural_england_eir_request_-_tees_maintenance_dredging [2026/09/16 21:20] (current) nefcadmin
Line 1: Line 1:
 +===== 260308Natural England EIR Request - Tees Maintenance Dredging =====
 +
 ===== Summary ===== ===== Summary =====
  
Line 5: Line 7:
 No evidence of consultations has been reported. No evidence of consultations has been reported.
  
-1. PD Ports has not consulted NE on the impacts of the operations of dredging on protected sites etc. +  - PD Ports has not consulted NE on the impacts of the operations of dredging on protected sites etc. 
-2. PD Ports have not consulted NE on TSHD overflow and contaminant recirculation.  However, NE in Reference A made relevant recommendations.  +  PD Ports have not consulted NE on TSHD overflow and contaminant recirculation.  However, NE in Reference A made relevant recommendations.  
-3. PD Ports have not consulted NE on TSHD dredging operation within the estuary on foraging. +  PD Ports have not consulted NE on TSHD dredging operation within the estuary on foraging. 
-4. Water framework directive I should approach the Environment Agency. +  Water framework directive I should approach the Environment Agency. 
-5. NE advised MMO to ensure cumulative impacts of all dredging within the River Tees were considered, I can only find evidence with respect to the disposal operation not the dredging operations. +  NE advised MMO to ensure cumulative impacts of all dredging within the River Tees were considered, I can only find evidence with respect to the disposal operation not the dredging operations. 
-6. NE not consulted on site specific contaminants.+  NE not consulted on site specific contaminants.
  
  
Line 213: Line 215:
 Natural England is therefore satisfied that the information requested fits the definition of personal data and that its release would be ‘unfair’ under the meaning of the first Data Protection Principle and should not be released.  Natural England is therefore satisfied that the information requested fits the definition of personal data and that its release would be ‘unfair’ under the meaning of the first Data Protection Principle and should not be released. 
  
 +====== Other Pages That Link To This Page ======
 +
 +{{backlinks>.}}
260308natural_england_eir_request_-_tees_maintenance_dredging.1785684465.txt.gz · Last modified: by nefcadmin