North East File Collection - NEFC

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
able_uk_-_dredging_the_tees

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
able_uk_-_dredging_the_tees [2024/07/04 09:27] – nefcadminable_uk_-_dredging_the_tees [2024/07/25 21:12] (current) – nefcadmin
Line 7: Line 7:
 ==== Project Background ==== ==== Project Background ====
 "Requesting new licence to replace previous one L/2012/00160/8. "Requesting new licence to replace previous one L/2012/00160/8.
-Objective is to improve access into Able Seaton Port by deepening approach channel and maintaining access thereafter.+Objective is to improve access into [[https://www.ableuk.com/able-seaton-port|Able Seaton Port]] by deepening approach channel and maintaining access thereafter.
 The facility is an emerging business and works will be undertaken on demand in accordance with commercial developments. The facility is an emerging business and works will be undertaken on demand in accordance with commercial developments.
  
Line 30: Line 30:
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|Application Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|Application Form]]
  
-==== Variation 1 - 2017 March 15 ====+==== Variation 1 - 2017 March 15 - accepted ====
  
 Removal of silt sediment on the grounding bed within the dry dock by divers using hand suction - maximum amount 700 dry tonnes. Removal of silt sediment on the grounding bed within the dry dock by divers using hand suction - maximum amount 700 dry tonnes.
Line 36: Line 36:
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/1/MLA_2015_00334_1-VARIATION-1-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/1/MLA_2015_00334_1-VARIATION-1-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
  
-==== Variation 2  - 2017 June 28 ====+==== Variation 2  - 2017 June 28 - accepted ====
  
 MMO calculation of wet tonnes is a lower figure than applicant will remove, so request to revert to applicant requested higher wet tonnes figures. MMO calculation of wet tonnes is a lower figure than applicant will remove, so request to revert to applicant requested higher wet tonnes figures.
Line 42: Line 42:
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/2/MLA_2015_00334_2-VARIATION-2-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/2/MLA_2015_00334_2-VARIATION-2-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
  
-==== Variation 3 - 2017 October 11 ====+==== Variation 3 - 2017 October 11 - withdrawn ====
  
 Extension of the license to include to dredge the wet dock (previously dry dock) adjacent to berths 8 and 9, from present depth of 6.5 meters to 8.5 meters, to accommodate semi submersible rigs.  Request exemption from any seasonal limitations to dredging due to being with wet dock. Extension of the license to include to dredge the wet dock (previously dry dock) adjacent to berths 8 and 9, from present depth of 6.5 meters to 8.5 meters, to accommodate semi submersible rigs.  Request exemption from any seasonal limitations to dredging due to being with wet dock.
Line 48: Line 48:
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/3/MLA_2015_00334_3-VARIATION-3-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/3/MLA_2015_00334_3-VARIATION-3-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
  
-==== Variation 4 - 2018 February 9 ====+==== Variation 4 - 2018 February 9 - accepted ====
  
 Extend license to include TERRC Basin, using a wide range of dredgers, this is necessary to allow access Quay 6 by a wider range of vessels. Extend license to include TERRC Basin, using a wide range of dredgers, this is necessary to allow access Quay 6 by a wider range of vessels.
Line 54: Line 54:
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/4/MLA_2015_00334_4-VARIATION-4-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/4/MLA_2015_00334_4-VARIATION-4-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
  
-==== Variation 5 - 2020 Septebmer 2 ====+==== Variation 5 - 2020 Septebmer 2 - withdrawn ====
  
 Extension to allow the use of erosion control matting over the intertidal flats where the existing slopes will be steepened, this has also been requested of Able UK by the Power Station. Extension to allow the use of erosion control matting over the intertidal flats where the existing slopes will be steepened, this has also been requested of Able UK by the Power Station.
Line 60: Line 60:
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/5/MLA_2015_00334_5-VARIATION-5-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/5/MLA_2015_00334_5-VARIATION-5-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
  
-==== Variation 6 - 2020 September 4 ====+==== Variation 6 - 2020 September 4 - accepted ====
  
 Correct coordinates on the license to align with real areas where work is being undertaken. Correct coordinates on the license to align with real areas where work is being undertaken.
Line 66: Line 66:
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/6/MLA_2015_00334_6-VARIATION-6-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/6/MLA_2015_00334_6-VARIATION-6-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
  
-==== Variation 7 - 2020 September 14 ====+==== Variation 7 - 2020 September 14 - accepted ====
  
 Include additional areas within the holding basin where an additional 30,000 tonnes of clay will be removed.  This will result in a deepening of the area within the holding basin from -9.5mCD to -13.5mCD, making this part of Quay 10. Include additional areas within the holding basin where an additional 30,000 tonnes of clay will be removed.  This will result in a deepening of the area within the holding basin from -9.5mCD to -13.5mCD, making this part of Quay 10.
Line 86: Line 86:
 ==== Variation 10 - 2022 September 28 - accepted ==== ==== Variation 10 - 2022 September 28 - accepted ====
  
-1) Incorrect Coordinates +This variation is all about correcting numerous errors which were in the original application and in a number of the subsequent variations, all the errors are claimed to make no significant difference to the impact of the application (editor's note - concerning that so many errors exist, as while these have been corrected, how many errors have occurred in the implementation of the license which have not been recorded). 
-Upon review, 6no coordinates on Licence Schedules (Able Seaton Port + 
-Holding basin and Channel) are to be amended correctly. +1) Correct Incorrect Coordinates: 6 coordinates on Licence Schedules (Able Seaton Port Holding basin and Channel) are to be amended correctly: Historically Seaton Channel has been dredged to a depth of up to - 5.8mCD and a width of up to 164m; Seaton Channel joins the River Tees at a location that is maintained by PD Ports at -11.7mCD (refer to Admiralty Chart for Tees and Hartlepool Bays); The intersection between Seaton Channel and the River Tees is formed by a slope falling (at around 1:3) from Seaton Channel to the River Tees. See attached drawing ASC002-00003 where the slope has been annotated; One of the original objectives of the MLA was to obtain consent for lowering Seaton Channel to -9.5mCD over a width of 85m up to its intersection with the River Tees; The coordinates for Seaton Channel in the original MLA were specified at the top of the slope connecting Seaton Channel to the River Tees; The substitute coordinates submitted in Variation 10 amends the coordinates so that they are located at the bottom of the slope.
-Historically Seaton Channel has been dredged to a depth of up to - +
-5.8mCD and a width of up to 164m. Seaton Channel joins the River Tees +
-at a location that is maintained by PD Ports at -11.7mCD (refer to +
-Admiralty Chart for Tees and Hartlepool Bays). The intersection between +
-Seaton Channel and the River Tees is formed by a slope falling (at around +
-1:3) from Seaton Channel to the River Tees. See attached drawing ASC002-00003 where the slope has been annotated. One of the original +
-objectives of the MLA was to obtain consent for lowering Seaton Channel +
-to -9.5mCD over a width of 85m up to its intersection with the River Tees. +
-The coordinates for Seaton Channel in the original MLA were specified at +
-the top of the slope connecting Seaton Channel to the River Tees. The +
-substitute coordinates submitted in Variation 10 amends the coordinates +
-so that they are located at the bottom of the slope.+
 See attached of PDF table See attached of PDF table
-2) Incorrect Quantities +2) Correct Incorrect Quantities: non-material corrections in addition to the coordinate corrections: 
-Following a review of the Marine licence we request the following nonmaterial corrections in addition to the coordinate corrections: +i.Due to historic errors, the disposal tonnages are not consistent with the dredge volumes. In particular: 
-1.Due to historic errors, the disposal tonnages are not consistent with +a.V3 of the Licence permitted 1,212,000 wet tonnes of clay to be deposited but this have been 1.221,000T (555,000m3*2.2); b.V6 of the Licence increased the permitted capital dredge volume of clay in Activity 1.1 from 545,000m3 to 575,000m3 but there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been; c.V8 of the Licence increased the permitted total capital dredge volume in Activity 1.1 by 145,000m3, but again there was no commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been.  We request changes to the disposal tonnages so that they are consistent with the dredge volumes. A spreadsheet is attached to evidence the working. No new dredging is being requested. These are simply corrections to the disposal tonnages that have occurred due to historic drafting errors. 
-the dredge volumes. In particular: +ii.We request a change to the volumes provided in Activity 1.2 as the volumes of silt and clay have been wrongly transposed from V6 of the Licence and both were incorrectly identified as silt in V7. 
-a.V3 of the Licence permitted 1,212,000 wet tonnes of clay to be +iii.We request that where annual volumes are specifically stated for Site 2, these volumes can be carried over to subsequent years as dredging may not occur every year but silt will still accumulate. 
-deposited but this have been 1.221,000T (555,000m3*2.2); +iv.V8 allowed for Seaton Channel to be widened and a consequential additional capital dredge of 145,000m3 . We advised that this would be silts and clays. All of the material is expected to be dredged by BHD and 
-b.V6 of the Licence increased the permitted capital dredge volume of clay +will comprise silts/soft clays and stiff clay. We propose amending Activity 1.1 so that the whole of the additional dredging is classed as clay and that Activity 4.1 is amended to permit the anticipated 50,000m3 of silts/soft clays to be deposited in Tees Bay A. 
-in Activity 1.1 from 545,000m3 to 575,000m3 but there was no +5.A number of dredging methods are consented within the Licence but Activity 1.1 only describes backhoe dredging, we request that the methodology is extended to include TSHD which is consented for other
-commensurate increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there +
-should have been; +
-c.V8 of the Licence increased the permitted total capital dredge volume in +
-Activity 1.1 by 145,000m3, but again there was no commensurate +
-increase in the permitted disposal tonnage as there should have been. +
-We request changes to the disposal tonnages so that they are consistent +
-with the dredge volumes. A spreadsheet is attached to evidence the +
-working. No new dredging is being requested. These are simply +
-corrections to the disposal tonnages that have occurred due to historic +
-drafting errors. +
-2.We request a change to the volumes provided in Activity 1.2 as the +
-volumes of silt and clay have been wrongly transposed from V6 of the +
-Licence and both were incorrectly identified as silt in V7. +
-3.We request that where annual volumes are specifically stated for Site 2, +
-these volumes can be carried over to subsequent years as dredging may +
-not occur every year but silt will still accumulate. +
-4.V8 allowed for Seaton Channel to be widened and a consequential +
-additional capital dredge of 145,000m3 . We advised that this would be +
-MLA/2015/00334/12 +
-Page 2 of 3 +
-silts and clays. All of the material is expected to be dredged by BHD and +
-will comprise silts/soft clays and stiff clay. We propose amending Activity +
-1.1 so that the whole of the additional dredging is classed as clay and +
-that Activity 4.1 is amended to permit the anticipated 50,000m3 of +
-silts/soft clays to be deposited in Tees Bay A. +
-5.A number of dredging methods are consented within the Licence but +
-Activity 1.1 only describes backhoe dredging, we request that the +
-methodology is extended to include TSHD which is consented for other+
 Activities. Activities.
-6.We request a change to the text describing the methodology of Activity +6.We request a change to the text describing the methodology of Activity 2.1 to remove reference to 30,000T of clay which is not in any event listed in the quantities for that Activity. 
-2.1 to remove reference to 30,000T of clay which is not in any event listed +7.We request that Activity 2.3 is split into two Activities, one covering the capital works and the other the maintenance works. 
-in the quantities for that Activity. +8.We request changes to the description and methodology of Activities 3.1 and 4.1 to remove inconsistencies in the current wording. 
-7.We request that Activity 2.3 is split into two Activities, one covering the +9.We request corrections to the description of the source of material specified in Activity 3.1 and 4.1 
-capital works and the other the maintenance works. +All of our proposed textual changes to the Licence are included in the attached WORD document with the changes tracked for transparency.
-8.We request changes to the description and methodology of Activities +
-3.1 and 4.1 to remove inconsistencies in the current wording. +
-9.We request corrections to the description of the source of material +
-specified in Activity 3.1 and 4.1 +
-All of our proposed textual changes to the Licence are included in the +
-attached WORD document with the changes tracked for transparency. +
  
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/10/MLA_2015_00334_10-VARIATION-10-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/10/MLA_2015_00334_10-VARIATION-10-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
  
-==== Variation 11 ==== +==== Variation 11 - 2023 March 11 - accepted ====
  
 +The proposal will deepen a minor area of the existing dredged "Holding  Basin" from -9.5mCD to -13.5mCD, which is the same depth as Quay 10 and 11. This will result in increased activity of dredging and disposal of 1,250m3. The dredge will be completed within one day and undertaken by a backhoe dredger with disposal at Tees Bay C, in alignment with Marine Licence L/2017/00012/9
 +Changes
 +1.Dredge Quantity in Activity 1.1 to increase by 1,250m3
 +2.Disposal Activity 3.1 - 1,474,000 tonnes will increase to 1,476,750 tonnes.
 +3.Updated Dredge Location Plan Schedule Document - “Dredge Location Drawing ASC-001-00009 (L)”.
  
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/11/MLA_2015_00334_11-VARIATION-11-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/11/MLA_2015_00334_11-VARIATION-11-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
  
-==== Variation 12 ====+==== Variation 12 - 2024 May 7 - accepted ====
  
 +Update of Schedule 3 of the licence to reflect the co-ordinates approved in Variation 11, illustrated on Drawing ASC-001-00009 L, which forms Schedule 6 of the licence.
 +The discrepancy between the approved co-ordinates in Schedules 3 and 6 is illustrated on attached drawing ASC-006- 00022 A.
  
 [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/12/MLA_2015_00334_12-VARIATION-12-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]] [[this>Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/12/MLA_2015_00334_12-VARIATION-12-FORM.pdf|Variation Form]]
Line 181: Line 140:
 2022 sample - surface port and channel - [[https://www.northeastfc.uk/Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Returns/CorrectedMAR01671 MMO_Results_Template Rev 1.xlsm|MMO Template Spreadsheet - CorrectedMAR01671 MMO_Results_Template Rev 1.xlsm]] - sediment data explorer. 2022 sample - surface port and channel - [[https://www.northeastfc.uk/Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Returns/CorrectedMAR01671 MMO_Results_Template Rev 1.xlsm|MMO Template Spreadsheet - CorrectedMAR01671 MMO_Results_Template Rev 1.xlsm]] - sediment data explorer.
 {{url>https://steps39.github.io/SedDataExp/SedimentDataExplorer.html?urls=https://www.northeastfc.uk/Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Returns/CorrectedMAR01671%20MMO_Results_Template%20Rev%201.xlsm&noninter=noninter}} {{url>https://steps39.github.io/SedDataExp/SedimentDataExplorer.html?urls=https://www.northeastfc.uk/Teesworks/Planning/MLA_2015_00334/Returns/CorrectedMAR01671%20MMO_Results_Template%20Rev%201.xlsm&noninter=noninter}}
 +
 +===== Magnor Dredger =====
 +
 +The work has used a number of dredgers including the Magnor, a backhoe dredger.  The Magnor has a 40m3 bucket with an arm which is able to dredge to depths of 32m.
 +
 +This Boskalis film shows the Magnor in operation and explains how it works.
 +
 +{{youtube>ZX2qdzCCcWM}}
 +
 +You can see the Magnor at work in Seaton Channel in the film below.
  
 ===== May 2024 ===== ===== May 2024 =====
Line 191: Line 160:
 {{youtube>AjcaNnUkbZw}} {{youtube>AjcaNnUkbZw}}
  
 +===== Dredging Today News Story =====
 +
 +{{url>https://www.dredgingtoday.com/2024/07/09/boskalis-in-middlesbrough-expanding-horizons-for-sustainable-dismantling/}}
 +
 +====== Middlesbrough Port ======
  
 +===== MLA-2024-00166 =====
  
 +[[MLA-2024-00166]]
  
able_uk_-_dredging_the_tees.1720085245.txt.gz · Last modified: by nefcadmin