Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- mla-2025-00157 [2026/09/17 08:07] – nefcadmin
+++ mla-2025-00157 [2026/09/17 11:39] (current) – [Shellfish Advice] nefcadmin
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
- Project description
+====== MLA/2025/00157 ======
-Project title
-Falmouth Docks Development
+===== Project description =====
-Project background
+**Project title**: Falmouth Docks Development
+**Project background**
 A&P Falmouth Ltd/FDEC is seeking approval to redevelop Falmouth Docks. The project aims to repair the aging dock infrastructure, enhancing berth capacity for alongside docking to support current business and future needs, including cruise and cargo capacity, and floating offshore wind (FLOW) market support. Existing layout drawing: 15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00001.
 Redevelopment activities, to be consented through a full planning application with Cornwall Council (PA25/01598) and this marine licence application with the MMO, include:
-•Pocket dredging berth areas for underkeel clearance for larger cruise vessels (up to Excellence class) and FLOW renewable energy devices, achieving depths of -10.5 m CD
+  * Pocket dredging berth areas for underkeel clearance for larger cruise vessels (up to Excellence class) and FLOW renewable energy devices, achieving depths of -10.5 m CD
-•Removing foul ground within former Kings and Empire Wharves regions
+  * Removing foul ground within former Kings and Empire Wharves regions
-•Surface skim the seabed on the site's eastern side (to achieve depths of -5.5 mCD)
+  * Surface skim the seabed on the site's eastern side (to achieve depths of -5.5 mCD)
-•Demolishing timber piles and infrastructure at Western Wharf
+  * Demolishing timber piles and infrastructure at Western Wharf
-•Constructing a new suspended deck structure at Western Wharf with a deck level of +8.36 mCD
+  * Constructing a new suspended deck structure at Western Wharf with a deck level of +8.36 mCD
-•Demolishing the Northern Arm concrete structure below seabed level and removing the gang walkway and old timber piles west of it
+  * Demolishing the Northern Arm concrete structure below seabed level and removing the gang walkway and old timber piles west of it
-•Constructing a suspended deck structure (Northern Wharf) within the existing 90 m gap between Queens Wharf and Northern Arm, extending functional wharf length with a deck level of +8.36 mCD
+  * Constructing a suspended deck structure (Northern Wharf) within the existing 90 m gap between Queens Wharf and Northern Arm, extending functional wharf length with a deck level of +8.36 mCD
-•Upgrading Queens Wharf structure and extending its suspended deck structure 50 m westward with a deck level of +8.4 mCD
+  * Upgrading Queens Wharf structure and extending its suspended deck structure 50 m westward with a deck level of +8.4 mCD
-•Installing a 290 m deck ('FLOW Deck') for FLOW device facilitation, with a deck level of +8.36 mCD
+  * Installing a 290 m deck ('FLOW Deck') for FLOW device facilitation, with a deck level of +8.36 mCD
-•Upgrading Duchy Wharf structure to support a FLOW device with a deck level of +8.24 mCD
+  * Upgrading Duchy Wharf structure to support a FLOW device with a deck level of +8.24 mCD
-•Potential strengthening works to Duchy and Country Wharf piles
+  * Potential strengthening works to Duchy and Country Wharf piles
-•Demolishing on-site buildings and reconfiguring dock activities
+  * Demolishing on-site buildings and reconfiguring dock activities
 These improvements are crucial as the current infrastructure, particularly in the Western Wharf area, is unsafe for operational use, and the central causeway risks failure without development. More information in the ES
-Programme of works
+**Programme of works**
 The outline programme for the project is based on a worst-case programme scenario, developed to inform environmental assessments. ES Chapter 5, Section 5.2 provides more detail of the anticipated timescales associated with the demolition and construction stage. For all decks the general programming assumes the following broad activities: enabling and strengthening works, demolition, dredging, construction of new infrastructure, and finishing works. Works are anticipated to take a duration of approximately 42 months if wharfs are built in parallel. It is possible that the demolition and construction stage could occur over a longer duration if wharfs are constructed sequentially. In addition, wharfs could potentially be constructed in any order, and it is requested that the sequencing of demolition and construction is read as indicative.
 However a detailed programme has not yet been produced and will be dependent on licences, funding and contractor methods/availability. Parts of the proposed development may need to be taken forward in a different order according to business needs and funding arrangements.
 The dock currently operates 24 hours per day, 7 days a week and it is anticipated that the majority of construction works would be undertaken on this basis, with the exception of demolition, piling and compaction which would not be undertaken at nighttime.
-Other information
-Applicant details
-Mr   Drystan Jones / 01326 214 860 / Drystan.Jones@ap-group.co.uk
-A & P FALMOUTH LIMITED / THE DOCKS FALMOUTH / TR11 4NR
-Date application submitted
--MAR-2025
-Date application validated
--APR-2025
-Status
-Submitted
-(In progress)
+**Other information**
+Applicant details: A & P FALMOUTH LIMITED / THE DOCKS FALMOUTH / TR11 4NR//
+Date application submitted: 31-MAR-2025//
+Date application validated: 02-APR-2025//
+Status: Submitted (In progress)
+View Application - [[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA 2025 00157-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|MLA_2025_00157-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf]]
+===== Response Documents =====
+===== Additional Documents =====
 | File | Date | Size |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00019 Strategic Appraisal for Sustainable Development.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00019_Strategic_Appraisal_for_Sustainable_Development.pdf]]|414 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00019_Strategic_Appraisal_for_Sustainable_Development.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00019_Strategic_Appraisal_for_Sustainable_Development.pdf]]|414 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00016 EcIA.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00016_EcIA.pdf]]|4 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00002.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00002.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00004.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00004.pdf]]|2 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA05.3 BPEO Assessment for Dredging.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA05.3_BPEO_Assessment_for_Dredging.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA05.3_BPEO_Assessment_for_Dredging.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA05.3_BPEO_Assessment_for_Dredging.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-WW-DR-CM-00003.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-WW-DR-CM-00003.pdf]]|781 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-WW-DR-CM-00004.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-WW-DR-CM-00004.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
@@ Line 54: / Line 61: @@
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/D2014 00042188 fal and Helford.PDF|D2014 00042188 fal and Helford.PDF]]|7 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00001.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00001.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 CH01 Introduction.pdf|ES_Vol1_CH01_Introduction.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_CH01_Introduction.pdf|ES_Vol1_CH01_Introduction.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch02 EIA Process and Methodology.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch02_EIA Process and Methodology.pdf]]|148 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch02_EIA Process and Methodology.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch02_EIA Process and Methodology.pdf]]|148 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch03 Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch03_Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch03_Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch03_Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch04 Proposed Development Description.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch04_Proposed Development Description.pdf]]|4 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch04_Proposed Development Description.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch04_Proposed Development Description.pdf]]|4 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch07 Underwater Noise 02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch07_Underwater_Noise_02.pdf]]|2 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch07_Underwater_Noise_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch07_Underwater_Noise_02.pdf]]|2 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch11 Marine Archaeology.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch11_Marine Archaeology.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch11_Marine Archaeology.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch11_Marine Archaeology.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch12 Heritage.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch12_Heritage.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch12_Heritage.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch12_Heritage.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch13 Transport and Accessibility.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch13_Transport and Accessibility.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch13_Transport and Accessibility.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch13_Transport and Accessibility.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch14 Noise and Vibration.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch14_Noise and Vibration.pdf]]|975 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch14_Noise and Vibration.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch14_Noise and Vibration.pdf]]|975 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch15 Air Quality.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch15_Air_Quality.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch15_Air_Quality.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch15_Air_Quality.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch16 Climate Change.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch16_Climate Change.pdf]]|676 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch16_Climate Change.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch16_Climate Change.pdf]]|676 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch17 Material Resource and Waste.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch17_Material Resource and Waste.pdf]]|657 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch17_Material Resource and Waste.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch17_Material Resource and Waste.pdf]]|657 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch18 SLVIA.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch18_SLVIA.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch18_SLVIA.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch18_SLVIA.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch19 Socioeconomics.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch19_Socioeconomics.pdf]]|777 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch19_Socioeconomics.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch19_Socioeconomics.pdf]]|777 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch20 Intra Cumulative 02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch20_Intra Cumulative_02.pdf]]|268 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch20_Intra Cumulative_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch20_Intra Cumulative_02.pdf]]|268 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch21 Residual Effects 02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch21_Residual Effects_02.pdf]]|324 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch21_Residual Effects_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch21_Residual Effects_02.pdf]]|324 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA01.3 Info req in ES.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA01.3_Info_req_in_ES.pdf]]|109 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA01.3_Info_req_in_ES.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA01.3_Info_req_in_ES.pdf]]|109 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 CH00 Cover Contents Abr Glossary.pdf|ES_Vol1_CH00_Cover_Contents_Abr_Glossary.pdf]]|272 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_CH00_Cover_Contents_Abr_Glossary.pdf|ES_Vol1_CH00_Cover_Contents_Abr_Glossary.pdf]]|272 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch05 Demolition and Construction Description 02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch05_Demolition and Construction Description_02.pdf]]|923 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch05_Demolition and Construction Description_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch05_Demolition and Construction Description_02.pdf]]|923 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 00 Cover Contents.pdf|ES_Vol2_00_Cover_Contents.pdf]]|115 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_00_Cover_Contents.pdf|ES_Vol2_00_Cover_Contents.pdf]]|115 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA01.1 IEMA Quality Mark Checklist.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA01.1_IEMA_Quality_Mark_Checklist.pdf]]|87 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA01.1_IEMA_Quality_Mark_Checklist.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA01.1_IEMA_Quality_Mark_Checklist.pdf]]|87 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA01.2 Reg 18(5)(b) Statement.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA01.2_Reg_18%25285%2529%2528b%2529_Statement.pdf]]|147 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA01.2_Reg_18(5)(b)_Statement.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA01.2_Reg_18(5)(b)_Statement.pdf]]|147 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.01 EIA Stages.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.01_EIA_Stages.pdf]]|99 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.01_EIA_Stages.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.01_EIA_Stages.pdf]]|99 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.02 EIA Scoping Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.02_EIA_Scoping_Report.pdf]]|18 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.02_EIA_Scoping_Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.02_EIA_Scoping_Report.pdf]]|18 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.03 CC EIA Scoping Opinion.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.03_CC_EIA_Scoping_Opinion.pdf]]|318 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.03_CC_EIA_Scoping_Opinion.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.03_CC_EIA_Scoping_Opinion.pdf]]|318 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.04 MMO EIA Scoping Opinion.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.04_MMO_EIA_Scoping_Opinion.pdf]]|624 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.04_MMO_EIA_Scoping_Opinion.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.04_MMO_EIA_Scoping_Opinion.pdf]]|624 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.05 Scoping Opinion Responses.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.05_Scoping_Opinion_Responses.pdf]]|122 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.05_Scoping_Opinion_Responses.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.05_Scoping_Opinion_Responses.pdf]]|122 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.06 Applicant's Scoping Opinion Response and Revised Opinions.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.06_Applicant%2527s_Scoping_Opinion_Response_and_Revised_Opinions.pdf]]|13 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.06_Applicant%2527s_Scoping_Opinion_Response_and_Revised_Opinions.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.06_Applicant%2527s_Scoping_Opinion_Response_and_Revised_Opinions.pdf]]|13 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.07 Definition Cumulatives.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.07_Definition_Cumulatives.pdf]]|83 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.07_Definition_Cumulatives.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.07_Definition_Cumulatives.pdf]]|83 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.08 Cumulative Schemes.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.08_Cumulative_Schemes.pdf]]|169 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.08_Cumulative_Schemes.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.08_Cumulative_Schemes.pdf]]|169 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.09 NRA.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.09_NRA.pdf]]|9 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.09_NRA.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.09_NRA.pdf]]|9 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.10 FRA.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.10_FRA.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.10_FRA.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.10_FRA.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA05.1 Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan 02.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA05.1_Outline_Construction_Environmental_Management_Plan_02.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA05.1_Outline_Construction_Environmental_Management_Plan_02.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA05.1_Outline_Construction_Environmental_Management_Plan_02.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA05.2 Outline Site Waste Management Plan.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA05.2_Outline_Site_Waste_Management_Plan.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA05.2_Outline_Site_Waste_Management_Plan.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA05.2_Outline_Site_Waste_Management_Plan.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA06.2 Sediment Transport Modelling Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.2_Sediment_Transport_Modelling_Report.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA06.2_Sediment_Transport_Modelling_Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.2_Sediment_Transport_Modelling_Report.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA06.3 Sediment Plume Modelling Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.3_Sediment_Plume_Modelling_Report.pdf]]|15 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA06.3_Sediment_Plume_Modelling_Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.3_Sediment_Plume_Modelling_Report.pdf]]|15 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA06.1 Wave Modelling.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.1_Wave_Modelling.pdf]]|44 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA06.1_Wave_Modelling.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.1_Wave_Modelling.pdf]]|44 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA07.1 Underwater Noise.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA07.1_Underwater_Noise.pdf]]|42 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA07.1_Underwater_Noise.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA07.1_Underwater_Noise.pdf]]|42 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA08.1 Factual GI Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA08.1_Factual_GI_Report.pdf]]|12 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA08.1_Factual_GI_Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA08.1_Factual_GI_Report.pdf]]|12 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA08.2 Contamination DS.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA08.2_Contamination_DS.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA08.2_Contamination_DS.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA08.2_Contamination_DS.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA08.3 Ground Investigation Interpretative Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA08.3_Ground_Investigation_Interpretative_Report.pdf]]|13 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA08.3_Ground_Investigation_Interpretative_Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA08.3_Ground_Investigation_Interpretative_Report.pdf]]|13 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA06.4 Tidal Flow Modelling.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.4_Tidal_Flow_Modelling.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA06.4_Tidal_Flow_Modelling.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.4_Tidal_Flow_Modelling.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.11 EcIA.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.11_EcIA.pdf]]|4 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.11_EcIA.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.11_EcIA.pdf]]|4 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA11.1 Marine DBA.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA11.1_Marine DBA.pdf]]|15 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA11.1_Marine DBA.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA11.1_Marine DBA.pdf]]|15 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA11.2 Stage 1 and 2 Marine Geoarchaeological Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA11.2_Stage_1_and_2_Marine_Geoarchaeological_Assessment.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA11.2_Stage_1_and_2_Marine_Geoarchaeological_Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA11.2_Stage_1_and_2_Marine_Geoarchaeological_Assessment.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA11.3 WSI.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA11.3_WSI.pdf]]|10 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA11.3_WSI.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA11.3_WSI.pdf]]|10 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA12.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA12.1_Archaeological_Desk_Based_Assessment.pdf]]|7 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA12.1_Archaeological_Desk_Based_Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA12.1_Archaeological_Desk_Based_Assessment.pdf]]|7 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA12.2 GPA3 Exercise and Technical Note.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA12.2_GPA3_Exercise_and_Technical_Note.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA12.2_GPA3_Exercise_and_Technical_Note.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA12.2_GPA3_Exercise_and_Technical_Note.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA14.1-14.4  Noise and Vibration Technical Appendix.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA14.1-14.4_ Noise_and_Vibration Technical Appendix.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA14.1-14.4_ Noise_and_Vibration Technical Appendix.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA14.1-14.4_ Noise_and_Vibration Technical Appendix.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA15.1-15.3 Air Quality Technical Appendices.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA15.1-15.3_Air_Quality_Technical_Appendices.pdf]]|532 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA15.1-15.3_Air_Quality_Technical_Appendices.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA15.1-15.3_Air_Quality_Technical_Appendices.pdf]]|532 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA17.1 Circular Economy Statement & Materials Management Strategy.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA17.1_Circular_Economy_Statement_%2526_Materials_Management_Strategy.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA17.1_Circular_Economy_Statement_%2526_Materials_Management_Strategy.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA17.1_Circular_Economy_Statement_%2526_Materials_Management_Strategy.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA17.2 Outline Site Waste Management Plan.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA17.2_Outline_Site_Waste_Management_Plan.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA17.2_Outline_Site_Waste_Management_Plan.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA17.2_Outline_Site_Waste_Management_Plan.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.1 Supporting Figures.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.1_Supporting Figures.pdf]]|15 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.1_Supporting Figures.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.1_Supporting Figures.pdf]]|15 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.2 Policy and Guidance.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.2_Policy_and_Guidance.pdf]]|129 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.2_Policy_and_Guidance.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.2_Policy_and_Guidance.pdf]]|129 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.3 Assessment of Effects.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.3_Assessment_of_Effects.pdf]]|392 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.3_Assessment_of_Effects.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.3_Assessment_of_Effects.pdf]]|392 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA19.1  Economic Impact Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA19.1_ Economic_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]|741 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA19.1_ Economic_Impact_Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA19.1_ Economic_Impact_Assessment.pdf]]|741 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 01 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_01_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_01_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_01_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 02 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_02_of_12.pdf]]|8 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_02_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_02_of_12.pdf]]|8 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 03 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_03_of_12.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_03_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_03_of_12.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 04 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_04_of_12.pdf]]|8 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_04_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_04_of_12.pdf]]|8 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 06 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_06_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_06_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_06_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 05 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_05_of_12.pdf]]|8 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_05_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_05_of_12.pdf]]|8 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 07 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_07_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_07_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_07_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 08 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_08_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_08_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_08_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 09 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_09_of_12.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_09_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_09_of_12.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 10 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_10_of_12.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_10_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_10_of_12.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 11 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_11_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_11_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_11_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.5 Visualisations 12 of 12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_12_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_12_of_12.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.5_Visualisations_12_of_12.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.6 Viewpoint Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.6_Viewpoint_Assessment.pdf]]|268 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.6_Viewpoint_Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.6_Viewpoint_Assessment.pdf]]|268 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA13.1 Transport Assessment (1).pdf|ES_Vol2_TA13.1_Transport_Assessment %25281%2529.pdf]]|9 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA13.1_Transport_Assessment (1).pdf|ES_Vol2_TA13.1_Transport_Assessment (1).pdf]]|9 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA05.3 BPEO Assessment for Dredging.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA05.3_BPEO_Assessment_for_Dredging.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA05.3_BPEO_Assessment_for_Dredging.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA05.3_BPEO_Assessment_for_Dredging.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA06.4 Tidal Flow Modelling.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.4_Tidal_Flow_Modelling.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA06.4_Tidal_Flow_Modelling.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA06.4_Tidal_Flow_Modelling.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA09.1 Port Falmouth DDV Survey Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.1_Port_Falmouth_DDV_Survey_Report.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA09.1_Port_Falmouth_DDV_Survey_Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.1_Port_Falmouth_DDV_Survey_Report.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA09.2 Benthic Survey Scope Agreements.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.2_Benthic_Survey_Scope_Agreements.pdf]]|2 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA09.2_Benthic_Survey_Scope_Agreements.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.2_Benthic_Survey_Scope_Agreements.pdf]]|2 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA09.4 ERCCIS Data Search Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.4_ERCCIS_Data_Search_Report.pdf]]|7 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA09.4_ERCCIS_Data_Search_Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.4_ERCCIS_Data_Search_Report.pdf]]|7 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 18 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_18_of_18.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_18_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_18_of_18.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 10 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_10_of_18.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_10_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_10_of_18.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 11 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_11_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_11_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_11_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 12 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_12_of_18.pdf]]|799 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_12_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_12_of_18.pdf]]|799 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 13 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_13_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_13_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_13_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 14 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_14_of_18.pdf]]|8 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_14_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_14_of_18.pdf]]|8 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 15 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_15_of_18.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_15_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_15_of_18.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 16 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_16_of_18.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_16_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_16_of_18.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 17 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_17_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_17_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_17_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 03 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_03_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_03_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_03_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 04 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_04_of_18.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_04_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_04_of_18.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 05 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_05_of_18.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_05_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_05_of_18.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 06 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_06_of_18.pdf]]|7 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_06_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_06_of_18.pdf]]|7 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 07 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_07_of_18.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_07_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_07_of_18.pdf]]|3 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 08 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_08_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_08_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_08_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 09 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_09_of_18.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_09_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_09_of_18.pdf]]|6 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 01 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_01_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_01_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_01_of_18.pdf]]|5 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA18.4 Baseline Photography 02 of 18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_02_of_18.pdf]]|4 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_02_of_18.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA18.4_Baseline_Photography_02_of_18.pdf]]|4 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00003.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-DR-CM-00003.pdf]]|1 MB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
 |[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00018 Marine Plan and Policy Statement.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00018_Marine_Plan_and_Policy_Statement.pdf]]|624 KB  | 31-Mar-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch06 Coastal Processes 02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch06_Coastal_Processes_02.pdf]]|6 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch06_Coastal_Processes_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch06_Coastal_Processes_02.pdf]]|6 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch10 Commercial Fisheries and Shellfisheries 02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA09.3 Falmouth Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.3_Falmouth_Benthic_Ecology_Survey_Report.pdf]]|12 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA09.3_Falmouth_Benthic_Ecology_Survey_Report.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.3_Falmouth_Benthic_Ecology_Survey_Report.pdf]]|12 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth Non Technical Summary 02.pdf|Falmouth_Non_Technical_Summary_02.pdf]]|4 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_Non_Technical_Summary_02.pdf|Falmouth_Non_Technical_Summary_02.pdf]]|4 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch08 Marine Water and Sediment Quality.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch08_Marine_Water_and_Sediment_Quality.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch08_Marine_Water_and_Sediment_Quality.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch08_Marine_Water_and_Sediment_Quality.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol1 Ch09 Marine Ecology.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch09_Marine Ecology.pdf]]|5 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch09_Marine Ecology.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch09_Marine Ecology.pdf]]|5 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA09.5 Maerl Technical Note.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.5_Maerl_Technical_Note.pdf]]|7 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA09.5_Maerl_Technical_Note.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA09.5_Maerl_Technical_Note.pdf]]|7 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00022 WFD.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00022_WFD.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00022_WFD.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00022_WFD.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA08.4 Water Framework Directive Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA08.4_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA08.4_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA08.4_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017 HRA.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017_HRA.pdf]]|11 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017_HRA.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017_HRA.pdf]]|11 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES Vol2 TA02.12 Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.12_Habitats_Regulations_Assessment.pdf]]|11 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol2_TA02.12_Habitats_Regulations_Assessment.pdf|ES_Vol2_TA02.12_Habitats_Regulations_Assessment.pdf]]|11 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017 HRA.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017_HRA.pdf]]|11 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017_HRA.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017_HRA.pdf]]|11 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00022 WFD.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00022_WFD.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00022_WFD.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00022_WFD.pdf]]|2 MB  | 07-May-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA 2025 00157-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|MLA_2025_00157-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf]]|176 KB  | 26-Jun-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA_2025_00157-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf|MLA_2025_00157-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf]]|176 KB  | 26-Jun-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157 CC Consultation-Response 22-07-25.pdf|MLA202500157_CC_Consultation-Response_22-07-25.pdf]]|99 KB  | 04-Sep-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157_CC_Consultation-Response_22-07-25.pdf|MLA202500157_CC_Consultation-Response_22-07-25.pdf]]|99 KB  | 04-Sep-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157 CNL Consultation-Response 03-09-25.pdf|MLA202500157_CNL_Consultation-Response_03-09-25.pdf]]|308 KB  | 04-Sep-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157_CNL_Consultation-Response_03-09-25.pdf|MLA202500157_CNL_Consultation-Response_03-09-25.pdf]]|308 KB  | 04-Sep-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157 FHC Consultation-Response 01-09-25.pdf|MLA202500157_FHC_Consultation-Response_01-09-25.pdf]]|257 KB  | 11-Sep-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157_FHC_Consultation-Response_01-09-25.pdf|MLA202500157_FHC_Consultation-Response_01-09-25.pdf]]|257 KB  | 11-Sep-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth SPA AA Addendum.pdf|Falmouth_SPA_AA_Addendum.pdf]]|1 MB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_SPA_AA_Addendum.pdf|Falmouth_SPA_AA_Addendum.pdf]]|1 MB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth SAC AA Addendum.pdf|Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum.pdf]]|3 MB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum.pdf|Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum.pdf]]|3 MB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth EA-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_EA-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|785 KB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_EA-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_EA-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|785 KB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth Cornwall-National-Landscape-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_Cornwall-National-Landscape-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|2 MB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_Cornwall-National-Landscape-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_Cornwall-National-Landscape-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|2 MB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth FHA-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_FHA-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|241 KB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_FHA-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_FHA-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|241 KB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth IFCA-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_IFCA-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|748 KB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_IFCA-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_IFCA-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|748 KB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth StMawes-Harbour-CT-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_StMawes-Harbour-CT-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|265 KB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_StMawes-Harbour-CT-Consultation-Response.pdf|Falmouth_StMawes-Harbour-CT-Consultation-Response.pdf]]|265 KB  | 12-Nov-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20251216 Falmouth-Docks-MMO St.Mawes-Response.pdf|20251216_Falmouth-Docks-MMO_St.Mawes-Response.pdf]]|98 KB  | 16-Dec-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20251216_Falmouth-Docks-MMO_St.Mawes-Response.pdf|20251216_Falmouth-Docks-MMO_St.Mawes-Response.pdf]]|98 KB  | 16-Dec-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20251216 Falmouth-MMO NE Response-SPA.pdf|20251216_Falmouth-MMO_NE_Response-SPA.pdf]]|108 KB  | 16-Dec-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20251216_Falmouth-MMO_NE_Response-SPA.pdf|20251216_Falmouth-MMO_NE_Response-SPA.pdf]]|108 KB  | 16-Dec-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth SAC AA Addendum April 2026.pdf|Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_April_2026.pdf]]|8 MB  | 15-May-2026 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_April_2026.pdf|Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_April_2026.pdf]]|8 MB  | 15-May-2026 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth-Docks Public-Comments-Response.pdf|Falmouth-Docks_Public-Comments-Response.pdf]]|267 KB  | 23-Oct-2025 |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth-Docks_Public-Comments-Response.pdf|Falmouth-Docks_Public-Comments-Response.pdf]]|267 KB  | 23-Oct-2025 |
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Correction to MMO Consultation Request wording for MLA 2025 00157 (PA25 05579).msg|Correction to MMO Consultation Request wording for MLA_2025_00157 %2528PA25_05579%2529.msg]]|109 KB Cornwall Council Planning |  |
+|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Correction to MMO Consultation Request wording for MLA_2025_00157 (PA25_05579).msg|Correction to MMO Consultation Request wording for MLA_2025_00157 (PA25_05579).msg]]|109 KB Cornwall Council Planning |  |
+===== Representations =====
+==== Representation ====
-#### Representation
 I am writing to express my concern about application PA25/05579 (MLA/2025/00157) for Falmouth Docks capital dredge.
@@ Line 191: / Line 198: @@
 Submitted on Fri 05 Sep 2025 10:31
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I am writing to express my serious concern about the proposed dredging of Falmouth Harbour to accommodate larger cruise ships. While I understand the desire to encourage economic activity through cruise tourism, I believe this project carries significant risks for our environment, community and long-term sustainability.
@@ Line 208: / Line 215: @@
 Submitted on Fri 05 Sep 2025 10:29
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I am writing to object to Marine Licence Application MLA/2025/00157 (Falmouth Docks redevelopment and capital dredge).
@@ Line 215: / Line 222: @@
 . Flawed Ecological Assessment
-• The Environmental Impact Assessment acknowledges the presence of maerl beds and seagrass within and near the dredge footprint. Both are UK Priority Habitats, slow-growing, and irreplaceable once lost. The loss or smothering of these habitats is understated as “minor” or “not significant.”
+  *  The Environmental Impact Assessment acknowledges the presence of maerl beds and seagrass within and near the dredge footprint. Both are UK Priority Habitats, slow-growing, and irreplaceable once lost. The loss or smothering of these habitats is understated as “minor” or “not significant.”
-• Survey coverage was limited in season and spatial extent. Data gaps are acknowledged but dismissed, with impacts downplayed rather than properly quantified.
+  *  Survey coverage was limited in season and spatial extent. Data gaps are acknowledged but dismissed, with impacts downplayed rather than properly quantified.
-• Cumulative and indirect impacts (e.g., sediment plume dispersal, interactions with existing pressures in the Fal and Helford SAC) are given cursory treatment despite being critical.
+  *  Cumulative and indirect impacts (e.g., sediment plume dispersal, interactions with existing pressures in the Fal and Helford SAC) are given cursory treatment despite being critical.
-• There is no credible compensation strategy. Monitoring is not mitigation, and there is no plan to offset losses or deliver the 10% Biodiversity Net Gain required under the Cornwall Local Plan.
+  *  There is no credible compensation strategy. Monitoring is not mitigation, and there is no plan to offset losses or deliver the 10% Biodiversity Net Gain required under the Cornwall Local Plan.
 . Contaminated Sediments
-• The dredge involves disturbing ~850,000 tonnes of seabed material contaminated with tributyltin (TBT), copper, and heavy metals from historic dockyard activity.
+  *  The dredge involves disturbing ~850,000 tonnes of seabed material contaminated with tributyltin (TBT), copper, and heavy metals from historic dockyard activity.
-• Mobilisation of these pollutants threatens nearby oyster fisheries, shellfish waters, and marine food chains. Dilution and disposal at sea are not a substitute for safe containment.
+  *  Mobilisation of these pollutants threatens nearby oyster fisheries, shellfish waters, and marine food chains. Dilution and disposal at sea are not a substitute for safe containment.
 . Noise and Air Quality
-• The Noise & Vibration assessment underestimates the effects on both marine life and the local community. Dredging and construction are dismissed as “not significant” despite limited baseline monitoring and clear potential for disturbance.
+  *  The Noise & Vibration assessment underestimates the effects on both marine life and the local community. Dredging and construction are dismissed as “not significant” despite limited baseline monitoring and clear potential for disturbance.
-• Air Quality assessment minimises the effect of increased shipping, construction emissions, and the continued lack of shore power for cruise liners. Cruise vessels are among the most polluting transport modes, and the claim of negligible impact is not supported by robust evidence.
+  *  Air Quality assessment minimises the effect of increased shipping, construction emissions, and the continued lack of shore power for cruise liners. Cruise vessels are among the most polluting transport modes, and the claim of negligible impact is not supported by robust evidence.
 . Economic Justification
-• The scheme is being justified partly on economic grounds, including cruise liner expansion. However, evidence shows cruise passengers contribute little to the local economy: many do not disembark, and those who do spend less than visitors arriving by other means. This does not outweigh the long-term ecological risks.
+  *  The scheme is being justified partly on economic grounds, including cruise liner expansion. However, evidence shows cruise passengers contribute little to the local economy: many do not disembark, and those who do spend less than visitors arriving by other means. This does not outweigh the long-term ecological risks.
 . Procedural Irregularities
-• The MMO’s own consultation letter to Cornwall Council explicitly stated that this project “does not fall within Annex I or Annex II of Directive 2011/92/EU or Schedule A1 or A2 of the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 and as such environmental impact assessment under the MWR is not required and no environmental statement has been supplied.”
+  *  The MMO’s own consultation letter to Cornwall Council explicitly stated that this project “does not fall within Annex I or Annex II of Directive 2011/92/EU or Schedule A1 or A2 of the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 and as such environmental impact assessment under the MWR is not required and no environmental statement has been supplied.”
-• This is not a trivial error. It is a formal consultation document, and such wording risks having misled consultees, councillors, and members of the public into believing the scheme was of minimal impact. In fact, it is plainly a Schedule A2 project.
+  *  This is not a trivial error. It is a formal consultation document, and such wording risks having misled consultees, councillors, and members of the public into believing the scheme was of minimal impact. In fact, it is plainly a Schedule A2 project.
-• In these circumstances, the consultation period should be extended. To continue without extension undermines fairness, transparency, and legality.
+  *  In these circumstances, the consultation period should be extended. To continue without extension undermines fairness, transparency, and legality.
 Conclusion
 The application is environmentally unsound, legally compromised, and non-compliant with planning policy. The MMO should not grant this licence unless and until:
-• A revised Environmental Statement addresses the deficiencies outlined above;
+  *  A revised Environmental Statement addresses the deficiencies outlined above;
-• Proper compensation and Biodiversity Net Gain measures are included; and
+  *  Proper compensation and Biodiversity Net Gain measures are included; and
-• The consultation period is extended to remedy the procedural error and ensure meaningful participation.
+  *  The consultation period is extended to remedy the procedural error and ensure meaningful participation.
 Without these steps, this licence should be refused.
@@ Line 246: / Line 253: @@
 Submitted on Thu 04 Sep 2025 23:35
-#### Representation
+==== NEMRG - Representation ====
 The dredging proposed as part of this application is extreme and presents unacceptable known and unknown risks to the marine environment, as such this representation suggests 4 approaches which would significantly reduce the risks entailed while allowing the economic aims of the application to be achieved.
-. Very low environmental damage - replace berth pockets with floating structures taking advantage of the deep water harbour.
+  - Very low environmental damage - replace berth pockets with floating structures taking advantage of the deep water harbour.
-. Minimal environmental damage - create the berth pockets within cofferdams.
+  - Minimal environmental damage - create the berth pockets within cofferdams.
-. Considerably reduced environmental damage - Adopt current international dredging best practises combined with the reuse or land disposal of dredged materials.
+  - Considerably reduced environmental damage - Adopt current international dredging best practises combined with the reuse or land disposal of dredged materials.
-. Quantification of environmental damage - adopt current international dredging best practices.
+  - Quantification of environmental damage - adopt current international dredging best practices.
 Further details are provided in the attached document.
-#### Associated Files
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Representations/250904NEMRG-MLA_2025_00157-Representation.pdf|250904NEMRG-MLA_2025_00157-Representation.pdf]]
-*![]()Submitted on Thu 04 Sep 2025 22:35
+==== Falmouth Marine Conservation Representation ====
-#### Representation
 We welcome the submission of the Environmental Statement (ES) for the proposed Falmouth Docks extension and appreciates the opportunity to comment. Falmouth Marine Conservation are concerned about aspects of the impact assessment, the adequacy of proposed mitigation, and the scope of planned monitoring. As such, we are submitting a Holding Objection. If the additional information requested is provided and our concerns are fully addressed, we may be in a position to withdraw this objection. Please refer to our full response for detailed comments.
-#### Associated Files
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Representations/Falmouth Docks MMO licence FMC.pdf|Falmouth Docks MMO licence FMC.pdf]]
-*![]()Submitted on Thu 04 Sep 2025 21:26
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I object to the Falmouth Docks proposal for the following reasons.
@@ Line 312: / Line 315: @@
 Submitted on Thu 04 Sep 2025 21:25
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 The attached document is my formal objection to the A & P proposal to turn Falmouth's waters into an environmental toxic desert, to enable unwanted excessively large and highly polluting cruise ships to berth, on the pretext of facilitating green energy provision.
-#### Associated Files
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Representations/MMO Falmouth Object.pdf|MMO Falmouth Object.pdf]]
-*![]()Submitted on Thu 04 Sep 2025 14:14
+==== Cornwall Wildlife Trust Representation ====
-#### Representation
 Summary of overall position
@@ Line 326: / Line 327: @@
 We welcome the detailed Environmental Statement (ES) that has been submitted for the proposed extension to Falmouth docks. However, Cornwall Wildlife Trust still has concerns around several aspects of the application in terms of assessment of impacts, the extent and type of mitigation proposed, and the amount of monitoring planned. Consequently, this response takes the form of a Holding Objection. If the additional information we request is made available and fully addresses our concerns, we may be in a position to withdraw this holding objection. Please see our full response as submitted for detailed comments.
-#### Associated Files
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Representations/Falmouth Docks MMO licence CWT response FINAL.pdf|Falmouth Docks MMO licence CWT response FINAL.docx]]
-*![]()Submitted on Wed 03 Sep 2025 21:10
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I am writing to express my horror at the proposal to dredge 850,000 tons of seabed sediment in Falmouth harbour and the bay.
@@ Line 349: / Line 348: @@
 Submitted on Wed 03 Sep 2025 18:33
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I believe that the amount of dredging to be undertaken will have a very detrimental effect on the ecology of the surrounding area, removal of the sediments from the docks with all their pollutants contained within each dredge will only cause these sediments to be dispersed to the surrounding area.
@@ Line 357: / Line 356: @@
 Submitted on Wed 03 Sep 2025 18:26
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I do support the work related to the development of offshore wind but object to the drive to enable larger and more cruise ships to visit and the associated dredging. We are in a climate emergency and we need to be restoring marine ecosystems, which when healthy can play a huge role in carbon storage, rather than further destroying them. I do understand that the needs of the local economy are important, but research is clear that large cruise ships are environmentally detrimental in all sorts of ways, and some cities are now deliberately limiting their visits as a result of this. As others have said, visitors from cruise ships spend less onshore than other visitors, and I would urge that our marine environment be given the protection it deserves, especially given that healthy and diverse marine ecosystems can themselves play a key role in helping mitigate the disastrous impact of climate change.
@@ Line 363: / Line 362: @@
 Submitted on Wed 03 Sep 2025 17:55
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Whilst of course anybody can understand the importance of job creation for this massive operation, surely the incredibly fragile state of Falmouth Bay seabed cannot be ignored. The proposed dredging would stir up toxic sediments in an area of marine habitats.
@@ Line 370: / Line 369: @@
 Submitted on Wed 03 Sep 2025 12:49
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 The MMO has incorrectly stated that this project does not fall within Annex I/II of Directive 2011/92/EU or Schedule A1/A2 of the Marine Works Regulations. In reality, capital dredging and port expansion of this scale clearly qualifies as a Schedule A2 project, requiring full EIA scrutiny. This misclassification undermines the legality and transparency of the licensing process. The MMO must formally acknowledge the project’s correct categorisation and ensure that the EIA process fully complies with statutory requirements.
@@ Line 394: / Line 393: @@
 Submitted on Wed 03 Sep 2025 10:45
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I object to this proposal and mainly because I do not feel it has placed sufficient priority on the environment. The ‘do less’ scenario is only cursorily outlined in section 2.6.4; it is given scant consideration and dismissed before it has been explored. In fact, this should be the essence of an environmental approach: what can we do without disturbing and damaging the environment? The truth is that the FLOW infrastructure could be accommodated with far less intrusion; the docks could be repaired and reinforced, as outlined, without the scale of dredging (850,000 tonnes) proposed.
@@ Line 405: / Line 404: @@
 Submitted on Wed 03 Sep 2025 9:27
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Dear Marine Licensing Team,
@@ Line 412: / Line 411: @@
 . Incompatibility with Legislation and Environmental Protections
-• The project is subject to the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 and the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 (as amended), yet the current assessments are inadequate.
+  *  The project is subject to the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 and the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 (as amended), yet the current assessments are inadequate.
-• The site lies adjacent to the Fal & Helford SAC, which contains highly sensitive habitats such as maerl beds, growing only ~1 mm per year and exceptionally vulnerable to smothering (Blake & Maggs, 2003).
+  *  The site lies adjacent to the Fal & Helford SAC, which contains highly sensitive habitats such as maerl beds, growing only ~1 mm per year and exceptionally vulnerable to smothering (Blake & Maggs, 2003).
-• Legal obligations require an up-to-date Appropriate Assessment. Reliance on outdated mapping and only five seabed samples, over a decade old, does not satisfy this duty.
+  *  Legal obligations require an up-to-date Appropriate Assessment. Reliance on outdated mapping and only five seabed samples, over a decade old, does not satisfy this duty.
 . Environmental Impacts of Larger Cruise Ships
-• The dredging appears primarily intended to allow “ultra-deep” cruise ships to dock, even though offshore wind infrastructure can be transported on shallower-draft vessels.
+  *  The dredging appears primarily intended to allow “ultra-deep” cruise ships to dock, even though offshore wind infrastructure can be transported on shallower-draft vessels.
-• Cruise ships disproportionately increase local air pollution, carbon emissions, sewage discharge, and turbidity (Commoy et al., 2005; Deidun & Vella, 2011; Carić & Mackelworth, 2014).
+  *  Cruise ships disproportionately increase local air pollution, carbon emissions, sewage discharge, and turbidity (Commoy et al., 2005; Deidun & Vella, 2011; Carić & Mackelworth, 2014).
-• These risks conflict with the Environmental Act 2021 and Climate Change Act 2008, which emphasise sustainable, low-impact development.
+  *  These risks conflict with the Environmental Act 2021 and Climate Change Act 2008, which emphasise sustainable, low-impact development.
 . Insufficient Monitoring
-• The Environmental Statement lacks a credible plan for monitoring re-suspended contaminants (e.g. copper, mercury, arsenic) from historic antifouling biocides known to cause significant environmental harm (de Campos et al., 2022).
+  *  The Environmental Statement lacks a credible plan for monitoring re-suspended contaminants (e.g. copper, mercury, arsenic) from historic antifouling biocides known to cause significant environmental harm (de Campos et al., 2022).
-• The modelling provided fails to consider storm-induced plumes or cumulative impacts on maerl, eelgrass, and native oyster habitats.
+  *  The modelling provided fails to consider storm-induced plumes or cumulative impacts on maerl, eelgrass, and native oyster habitats.
-• No modern hydrographic surveys or independent monitoring regime are proposed, leaving the MMO without robust evidence of likely harm and the public not fully informed.
+  *  No modern hydrographic surveys or independent monitoring regime are proposed, leaving the MMO without robust evidence of likely harm and the public not fully informed.
 I therefore request that the MMO:
@@ Line 448: / Line 447: @@
 Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 13:58
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I object to this application on a number of grounds, there has been a flawed Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA): Sensitive habitats like Maerl beds and seagrass are acknowledged, however their loss is downplayed as “minor,” which is misleading given they are both irreplaceable and protected.
@@ Line 459: / Line 458: @@
 Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 13:57
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Subject: Formal Objection to Application MLA/2025/00157 – Environmental, Legal, and Public Health Risks
@@ Line 470: / Line 469: @@
 . Scientific and Survey Deficiencies
-• Only five grab samples were taken across the dredge zone—grossly insufficient to assess ecologically sensitive areas.
+  *  Only five grab samples were taken across the dredge zone—grossly insufficient to assess ecologically sensitive areas.
-• No modern habitat mapping using sonar, drone, or camera surveys, and no verification of nearby maerl or eelgrass beds.
+  *  No modern habitat mapping using sonar, drone, or camera surveys, and no verification of nearby maerl or eelgrass beds.
-• Absence of seasonal surveys—data collected only in November misses peak biological activity, spawning, and migration periods.
+  *  Absence of seasonal surveys—data collected only in November misses peak biological activity, spawning, and migration periods.
 These deficiencies fall short of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations 2017, which mandate comprehensive and representative baseline surveys.
 . Threats to Protected Habitats
-• Maerl beds, a critically slow-growing habitat and a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) feature, lie within 100–200 m of the proposed dredging zone, yet remain unsurveyed.
+  *  Maerl beds, a critically slow-growing habitat and a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) feature, lie within 100–200 m of the proposed dredging zone, yet remain unsurveyed.
-• Eelgrass beds, important for carbon storage ("blue carbon") and as nurseries for commercial fish species, risk irreversible smothering.
+  *  Eelgrass beds, important for carbon storage ("blue carbon") and as nurseries for commercial fish species, risk irreversible smothering.
-• This undermines the Habitats Regulations 2017, which require an Appropriate Assessment and application of the precautionary principle in the face of uncertainty.
+  *  This undermines the Habitats Regulations 2017, which require an Appropriate Assessment and application of the precautionary principle in the face of uncertainty.
 . Inadequate Assessment of Environmental Risk
-• Sediment plume modelling is simplistic, ignoring storm-driven resuspension, long-term turbidity, and cumulative impacts.
+  *  Sediment plume modelling is simplistic, ignoring storm-driven resuspension, long-term turbidity, and cumulative impacts.
-• Disturbance to marine mammals and seabirds has been dismissed without acoustic or disturbance modelling compliant with JNCC guidelines.
+  *  Disturbance to marine mammals and seabirds has been dismissed without acoustic or disturbance modelling compliant with JNCC guidelines.
-• No consideration of combined effects with other harbour and coastal activities, contrary to the Marine Policy Statement 2011 requirement for cumulative impact assessment.
+  *  No consideration of combined effects with other harbour and coastal activities, contrary to the Marine Policy Statement 2011 requirement for cumulative impact assessment.
 . Air Pollution, Carbon Emissions, and Climate Impacts
-• Dredging operations will generate significant CO₂, NOₓ, SOₓ, and particulate emissions, conflicting with the UK’s binding Climate Change Act 2008 (Net Zero target 2050).
+  *  Dredging operations will generate significant CO₂, NOₓ, SOₓ, and particulate emissions, conflicting with the UK’s binding Climate Change Act 2008 (Net Zero target 2050).
-• Re-suspension of organic-rich sediments will release “locked-in” blue carbon, undermining the UK’s climate adaptation and mitigation duties.
+  *  Re-suspension of organic-rich sediments will release “locked-in” blue carbon, undermining the UK’s climate adaptation and mitigation duties.
-• Dust and fine particulate emissions risk exceeding safe thresholds established under the Air Quality Standards Regulations 2010 and WHO Air Quality Guidelines (2021 update).
+  *  Dust and fine particulate emissions risk exceeding safe thresholds established under the Air Quality Standards Regulations 2010 and WHO Air Quality Guidelines (2021 update).
 . Public Health Concerns
-• Legacy pollutants (arsenic, cadmium, mercury, hydrocarbons) risk bioaccumulation in fish and shellfish, threatening both public health and Cornwall’s seafood industry.
+  *  Legacy pollutants (arsenic, cadmium, mercury, hydrocarbons) risk bioaccumulation in fish and shellfish, threatening both public health and Cornwall’s seafood industry.
-• Turbidity and contamination could compromise bathing water quality, potentially breaching obligations under the Bathing Water Regulations 2013 (derived from EU Bathing Water Directive 2006/7/EC).
+  *  Turbidity and contamination could compromise bathing water quality, potentially breaching obligations under the Bathing Water Regulations 2013 (derived from EU Bathing Water Directive 2006/7/EC).
-• Local communities face exposure to airborne pollutants in contravention of the Public Health Act 1936 and Environmental Protection Act 1990.
+  *  Local communities face exposure to airborne pollutants in contravention of the Public Health Act 1936 and Environmental Protection Act 1990.
 . Socio-Economic and Cultural Impacts
-• Falmouth Bay supports fishing, aquaculture, recreation, and tourism—all dependent on clean water and healthy ecosystems. Contamination or even the perception of pollution could devastate these sectors.
+  *  Falmouth Bay supports fishing, aquaculture, recreation, and tourism—all dependent on clean water and healthy ecosystems. Contamination or even the perception of pollution could devastate these sectors.
-• Damage to eelgrass and maerl beds undermines long-term ecosystem services, cultural heritage, and the Government’s “levelling up” commitments to coastal communities.
+  *  Damage to eelgrass and maerl beds undermines long-term ecosystem services, cultural heritage, and the Government’s “levelling up” commitments to coastal communities.
 . Legal Non-Compliance
-• The Habitats Regulations do not allow a “no likely significant effect” finding without robust evidence; speculative conclusions are unlawful.
+  *  The Habitats Regulations do not allow a “no likely significant effect” finding without robust evidence; speculative conclusions are unlawful.
-• The EIA Regulations 2017 mandate assessment of air quality, socio-economic, and ecological impacts—all inadequately addressed.
+  *  The EIA Regulations 2017 mandate assessment of air quality, socio-economic, and ecological impacts—all inadequately addressed.
-• The Marine Policy Statement 2011 requires precaution where evidence is lacking; this application disregards that statutory duty.
+  *  The Marine Policy Statement 2011 requires precaution where evidence is lacking; this application disregards that statutory duty.
-• The proposal also undermines obligations under the Environment Act 2021, which requires halting biodiversity decline and improving water quality.
+  *  The proposal also undermines obligations under the Environment Act 2021, which requires halting biodiversity decline and improving water quality.
 Conclusion
 Approving dredging under these conditions would be irresponsible, unlawful, and environmentally catastrophic. I urge the MMO to refuse consen
-#### Associated Files
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Representations/MMO MLA_2025_00157.pdf|MMO MLA_2025_00157.docx]]
-*![]()Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 13:36
+Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 13:36
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Dear Marine Licensing Team,
@@ Line 519: / Line 518: @@
 . Inadequate Environmental Assessment
-• Sensitive habitats such as maerl beds and seagrass are acknowledged yet dismissed as of “minor significance.” These are irreplaceable, priority habitats under UK conservation law.
+  *  Sensitive habitats such as maerl beds and seagrass are acknowledged yet dismissed as of “minor significance.” These are irreplaceable, priority habitats under UK conservation law.
-• The surveys underpinning the EcIA are limited in season and scope. Significant data gaps are acknowledged, yet conclusions proceed as though the evidence base were sound.
+  *  The surveys underpinning the EcIA are limited in season and scope. Significant data gaps are acknowledged, yet conclusions proceed as though the evidence base were sound.
-• Cumulative impacts with other pressures in the Fal Estuary are barely addressed. This is a major flaw given the multiple existing stressors on the system.
+  *  Cumulative impacts with other pressures in the Fal Estuary are barely addressed. This is a major flaw given the multiple existing stressors on the system.
 . Contaminated Sediment
-• The project proposes to disturb and move approximately 850,000 tonnes of seabed material.
+  *  The project proposes to disturb and move approximately 850,000 tonnes of seabed material.
-• These sediments are known to contain tributyltin (TBT) and heavy metals from historic dockyard activity.
+  *  These sediments are known to contain tributyltin (TBT) and heavy metals from historic dockyard activity.
-• Mobilisation of these contaminants risks spreading pollution into oyster beds and designated shellfish waters, posing ecological, economic, and public health risks.
+  *  Mobilisation of these contaminants risks spreading pollution into oyster beds and designated shellfish waters, posing ecological, economic, and public health risks.
 . Lack of Mitigation and Compensation
-• Mitigation measures are vague and rely heavily on “monitoring” rather than prevention.
+  *  Mitigation measures are vague and rely heavily on “monitoring” rather than prevention.
-• No credible compensation or restoration plan is offered for the loss of seagrass or maerl, despite their protected and slow-growing nature.
+  *  No credible compensation or restoration plan is offered for the loss of seagrass or maerl, despite their protected and slow-growing nature.
-• The scheme fails to demonstrate compliance with Cornwall Local Plan requirements for 10% biodiversity net gain. No marine or terrestrial BNG is calculated or provided.
+  *  The scheme fails to demonstrate compliance with Cornwall Local Plan requirements for 10% biodiversity net gain. No marine or terrestrial BNG is calculated or provided.
 . Procedural Concerns: The MMO Error
-• The MMO’s own consultation letter to Cornwall Council explicitly stated that the project “does not fall within Annex I or Annex II of Directive 2011/92/EU or Schedule A1 or A2 of the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 and as such environmental impact assessment under the MWR is not required and no environmental statement has been supplied.”
+  *  The MMO’s own consultation letter to Cornwall Council explicitly stated that the project “does not fall within Annex I or Annex II of Directive 2011/92/EU or Schedule A1 or A2 of the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007 and as such environmental impact assessment under the MWR is not required and no environmental statement has been supplied.”
-• This is not a trivial drafting slip. It is a formal consultation document, and its wording would have materially affected how councillors and members of the public understood the application.
+  *  This is not a trivial drafting slip. It is a formal consultation document, and its wording would have materially affected how councillors and members of the public understood the application.
-• Many consultees may reasonably have assumed the project was minor in scope and did not require EIA. In fact, the opposite is true.
+  *  Many consultees may reasonably have assumed the project was minor in scope and did not require EIA. In fact, the opposite is true.
 . Fairness of Consultation
-• Because of this error, consultees have not had a fair opportunity to respond.
+  *  Because of this error, consultees have not had a fair opportunity to respond.
-• The consultation period should therefore be extended to allow people to engage on the basis of correct information. To proceed otherwise risks undermining the integrity of the process.
+  *  The consultation period should therefore be extended to allow people to engage on the basis of correct information. To proceed otherwise risks undermining the integrity of the process.
 Conclusion
 The current application is environmentally unsound, procedurally compromised, and non-compliant with local policy. I therefore urge the MMO to:
-• Refuse this application outright, or
+  *  Refuse this application outright, or
-• Require a revised Environmental Statement addressing the shortcomings above, alongside an extension of the consultation period.
+  *  Require a revised Environmental Statement addressing the shortcomings above, alongside an extension of the consultation period.
 Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 13:30
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I am writing to you in reference to the application MLA/2025/00157 (Falmouth Docks capital dredge).
@@ Line 600: / Line 599: @@
 Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 13:11
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 (Continued from Public Representation 19)
@@ Line 620: / Line 619: @@
 Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 12:28
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Representing the organisation Ocean Rebellion as one of the co-founders.
@@ Line 654: / Line 653: @@
 Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 10:52
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Continued from PR 17:
@@ Line 664: / Line 663: @@
 Marine Pollution Bulletin 2018
-• Acoustic pollution from dredging disrupts communication and behavior in marine fauna.
+  *  Acoustic pollution from dredging disrupts communication and behavior in marine fauna.
-• Altered hydrography and sediment composition change ecosystem processes, affecting spawning grounds and feeding patterns.
+  *  Altered hydrography and sediment composition change ecosystem processes, affecting spawning grounds and feeding patterns.
-• Increased risk of invasive non-native species through altered substrates and water chemistry.
+  *  Increased risk of invasive non-native species through altered substrates and water chemistry.
 “These impacts demonstrate that dredging in major UK ports is frequently associated with changes to both physical marine environments and the ecological dynamics of affected regions, and that careful monitoring and mitigation are necessary to reduce long-term ecological harm.”
 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025326X18304545
@@ Line 674: / Line 673: @@
 Submitted on Mon 01 Sep 2025 10:50
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I am writing to object to the application (MLA/2025/00157 Application) to develop the docks at Falmouth – specifically
@@ Line 716: / Line 715: @@
 Submitted on Sun 31 Aug 2025 21:52
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Dear Marina Licensing Team,
@@ Line 767: / Line 766: @@
 Submitted on Sun 31 Aug 2025 19:55
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 i am submitting this objection as a concerned member of the public who sees an environmentally damaging development taking place in the name of economic gain. we don't need more cruise ships. they are hugely damaging operations in themselves.
@@ Line 776: / Line 775: @@
 Submitted on Sun 31 Aug 2025 3:32
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Dear Marine Licensing Team,
@@ Line 791: / Line 790: @@
 Submitted on Sat 30 Aug 2025 10:42
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Subject: Formal Objection to Application MLA/2025/00157 – Proposed Dredging of Falmouth Harbour
@@ Line 861: / Line 860: @@
 Submitted on Fri 29 Aug 2025 16:44
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 My representation is that -
@@ Line 893: / Line 892: @@
 Submitted on Fri 29 Aug 2025 13:17
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Please find below a briefing regarding application MLA/2025/00157 (Falmouth Docks capital dredge). I am concerned that the project has been incorrectly recorded as not falling under Annex I/II of Directive 2011/92/EU or Schedule A1/A2 of the Marine Works (EIA) Regulations 2007.
@@ Line 912: / Line 911: @@
 Submitted on Fri 29 Aug 2025 8:08
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I am writing to formally object to the above marine licence application for the proposed capital dredging of approximately 850,000 tonnes of seabed at Falmouth Docks and subsequent disposal at sea.
@@ Line 960: / Line 959: @@
 Submitted on Thu 28 Aug 2025 17:25
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Keep Our Sea Chemical Free (KOSCF) is a local community group concerned with the health of our oceans. We have recently had experience of a company trying to embark on a project in St.Ives Bay on the basis of inadequate science and a lack of baseline data. This is totally unacceptable at a time when our oceans are under severe threat. It is important that communities are able to trust that bodies like the MMO will properly scrutinise any major projects in our Cornish waters and that the precautionary principal will be applied.
@@ Line 976: / Line 975: @@
 Submitted on Thu 28 Aug 2025 16:28
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 The MMO have stated that this project doesn’t fall under Annex 1/11 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive or Schedule A1/A2 of the marine works regulations, so you don’t believe the application requires a full environmental impact assessment. This is simply wrong. By law, harbour construction and dredging for port expansion are Schedule A2 projects. That means they require full Environmental Impact Assessment. Given the scale of this dredge and its location beside a Special Area of Conservation, the project must be treated as a Schedule A2 development. By recording it otherwise, MMO undermines the legal process and risks rendering the whole assessment unsound. This is a procedural flaw that you must address otherwise the whole project is illegal. I am objecting on these grounds -
@@ Line 982: / Line 981: @@
 . Inadequate Survey Effort,
 Only five grab samples were taken across the entire dredging zone.
-• No high-resolution habitat mapping—no drop-down camera surveys, side-scan sonar, or multibeam bathymetry.
+  *  No high-resolution habitat mapping—no drop-down camera surveys, side-scan sonar, or multibeam bathymetry.
-• Surveys conducted only in November, missing peak biological activity seasons.
+  *  Surveys conducted only in November, missing peak biological activity seasons.
 . Failure to Account for Sensitive Habitats
-• Maerl beds, a protected and slow-growing habitat, have been recorded within 100–200 m of the dredge site.
+  *  Maerl beds, a protected and slow-growing habitat, have been recorded within 100–200 m of the dredge site.
-• The developer relies on 10-year-old maps and no updated mapping or verification has been done.
+  *  The developer relies on 10-year-old maps and no updated mapping or verification has been done.
-• Coarse sediments found in 2023 are compatible with maerl and other reef-forming species, yet no targeted investigations were conducted.
+  *  Coarse sediments found in 2023 are compatible with maerl and other reef-forming species, yet no targeted investigations were conducted.
 . Sediment Plume Risks Underplayed
-• Modelling suggests only “a few millimetres” of deposition, but fails to account for storm resuspension, fine sediment settling into maerl interstices, and light-blocking turbidity—all potentially lethal to sensitive species.
+  *  Modelling suggests only “a few millimetres” of deposition, but fails to account for storm resuspension, fine sediment settling into maerl interstices, and light-blocking turbidity—all potentially lethal to sensitive species.
 . Marine Mammal Impacts Neglected
-• The EIA dismisses risk to cetaceans and seals, relying on observers and general “good practice.”
+  *  The EIA dismisses risk to cetaceans and seals, relying on observers and general “good practice.”
-• No acoustic modelling or seasonal exclusion zones are proposed—Assessment falls short of JNCC standards.
+  *  No acoustic modelling or seasonal exclusion zones are proposed—Assessment falls short of JNCC standards.
 . Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Legally Weak
-• The HRA’s “no likely significant effect” conclusion is based on outdated data and unverified assumptions.
+  *  The HRA’s “no likely significant effect” conclusion is based on outdated data and unverified assumptions.
-• Cumulative and in-combination impacts with other regional projects are not assessed.
+  *  Cumulative and in-combination impacts with other regional projects are not assessed.
-• No contingency strategy exists if protected habitats are discovered during works.
+  *  No contingency strategy exists if protected habitats are discovered during works.
 ⸻
@@ Line 1007: / Line 1006: @@
 This application risks breaching several legal and policy frameworks:
-• Habitats Regulations 2017 — Developer must prove no adverse impacts on SAC (Special areas of conservation) integrity; current evidence is insufficient.
+  *  Habitats Regulations 2017 — Developer must prove no adverse impacts on SAC (Special areas of conservation) integrity; current evidence is insufficient.
-• Marine Policy Statement — Requires the precautionary principle where uncertainty exists, which is clearly the case.
+  *  Marine Policy Statement — Requires the precautionary principle where uncertainty exists, which is clearly the case.
-• EIA Regulations — Demand robust baseline evidence; the current baseline is far from sufficient.
+  *  EIA Regulations — Demand robust baseline evidence; the current baseline is far from sufficient.
 To be honest you should be ashamed of yourselves for misclassifying this project and clearly this is either negligence or has been done deliberately.
@@ Line 1017: / Line 1016: @@
 Submitted on Thu 28 Aug 2025 15:40
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I am writing with reference to the above application. Please note that the reference above only works if you remove the MLA/ prefix. That is confusing and it makes it likely that some people will think the site isn't working. The local press have been citing the above reference and telling people to go on to your site. They are likely to have just copied and pasted the ref number, and been told by the site that no such reference exists. This happened to me. As there will be a fair amount of confusion around this, could the consultation therefore be extended?
@@ Line 1037: / Line 1036: @@
 Submitted on Thu 28 Aug 2025 11:10
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 I wish to object this application. Rare maerl beds (North Atlantic coral) are recorded nearby, but the Environmental Impact Assessments are based on outdated maps, just five seabed samples (which ought to have been seasonal), and no modern habitat surveys.
@@ Line 1044: / Line 1043: @@
 What’s Being Proposed
-• Capital dredging of approximately 850,000 tonnes of seabed.
+  *  Capital dredging of approximately 850,000 tonnes of seabed.
-• Disposal of dredged material at sea.
+  *  Disposal of dredged material at sea.
-• Justification: deepen port for large vessels, including cruise liners and floating offshore wind (FLOW) infrastructure.
+  *  Justification: deepen port for large vessels, including cruise liners and floating offshore wind (FLOW) infrastructure.
 Flaws in the Marine Environmental Impact Assessments
 . Inadequate Survey Effort
-• Only five grab samples were taken across the entire dredging zone.
+  *  Only five grab samples were taken across the entire dredging zone.
-• No high-resolution habitat mapping—no drop-down camera surveys, side-scan sonar, or multibeam bathymetry.
+  *  No high-resolution habitat mapping—no drop-down camera surveys, side-scan sonar, or multibeam bathymetry.
-• Surveys conducted only in November, missing peak biological activity seasons.
+  *  Surveys conducted only in November, missing peak biological activity seasons.
 . Failure to Account for Sensitive Habitats
-• Maerl beds, a protected and slow-growing habitat, have been recorded within 100–200 m of the dredge site.
+  *  Maerl beds, a protected and slow-growing habitat, have been recorded within 100–200 m of the dredge site.
-• The developer relies on 10-year-old maps and no updated mapping or verification has been done.
+  *  The developer relies on 10-year-old maps and no updated mapping or verification has been done.
-• Coarse sediments found in 2023 are compatible with maerl and other reef-forming species, yet no targeted investigations were conducted.
+  *  Coarse sediments found in 2023 are compatible with maerl and other reef-forming species, yet no targeted investigations were conducted.
 . Sediment Plume Risks Underplayed
-• Modelling suggests only “a few millimetres” of deposition, but fails to account for storm resuspension, fine sediment settling into maerl interstices, and light-blocking turbidity—all potentially lethal to sensitive species.
+  *  Modelling suggests only “a few millimetres” of deposition, but fails to account for storm resuspension, fine sediment settling into maerl interstices, and light-blocking turbidity—all potentially lethal to sensitive species.
 . Marine Mammal Impacts Neglected
-• The EIA dismisses risk to cetaceans and seals, relying on observers and general “good practice.”
+  *  The EIA dismisses risk to cetaceans and seals, relying on observers and general “good practice.”
-• No acoustic modelling or seasonal exclusion zones are proposed—Assessment falls short of JNCC standards.
+  *  No acoustic modelling or seasonal exclusion zones are proposed—Assessment falls short of JNCC standards.
 . Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Legally Weak
-• The HRA’s “no likely significant effect” conclusion is based on outdated data and unverified assumptions.
+  *  The HRA’s “no likely significant effect” conclusion is based on outdated data and unverified assumptions.
-• Cumulative and in-combination impacts with other regional projects are not assessed.
+  *  Cumulative and in-combination impacts with other regional projects are not assessed.
-• No contingency strategy exists if protected habitats are discovered during works.
+  *  No contingency strategy exists if protected habitats are discovered during works.
 Approving this dredging would set a dangerous precedent, risking irreversible damage to protected marine habitats in favor of short-term economic gains. A healthy marine ecosystem is vital to Falmouth’s long-term environmental, economic, and cultural value.
 Please insure that there is :
-• Proper, modern benthic and maerl mapping using camera and sonar surveys.
+  *  Proper, modern benthic and maerl mapping using camera and sonar surveys.
-• Seasonal ecological surveys and independent plume modelling.
+  *  Seasonal ecological surveys and independent plume modelling.
@@ Line 1093: / Line 1092: @@
 Submitted on Thu 28 Aug 2025 10:12
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 Having lived for over 30 years in Valencia, Spain, I have seen the damage caused by cruise ships (and excess tourism generally) to the local economy and environment. They spew large numbers of people on shore for a short space of time who spend little in the local area. Local shops close and multinationals like McDonalds open to provide the usual fare found at tourist sites throughout the world. The visual impact of seeing a huge cruise ship in Cornish waters is 100% negative. The entire project seems to be designed to serve the cruise industry, where is the evidence that FLOW-related infrastructure requires a deeper harbour?
@@ Line 1103: / Line 1102: @@
 Submitted on Thu 28 Aug 2025 8:37
-#### Representation
+==== Representation ====
 As a fisherman who has worked at sea in the Falmouth Bay area for 45 years I am deeply concerned with the proposal to DUMP dredged waste from Falmouth docks into Falmouth Bay. The sediment will be highly TOXIC and to DUMP into the sea surely goes 100% against what the MMO supposedly stands for. Protecting our oceans and the marine environment.
@@ Line 1113: / Line 1112: @@
 Submitted on Wed 27 Aug 2025 22:08
-#### Representation
+==== Seal Research Trust Representation ====
 SRT has substantial concerns about this application, which seems inadequate to the extent that we would apply the precautionary principle and object to this application.
@@ Line 1132: / Line 1131: @@
-Case Consultation Responses
+===== Case Consultation Responses =====
+==== Environment Agency - Devon and Cornwall ====
-### Environment Agency - Devon and Cornwall
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 29 August 2025.
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 29 August 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1286: / Line 1284: @@
  Please contact us again if you require any further advice.
- Yours sincerely
- SARAH SQUIRE
  Sustainable Places - Planning Advisor
- Direct dial 0208 474 6316
+==== Natural England - 12 - Devon, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly ====
- Direct e-mail SPDC@environment-agency.gov.uk
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 8 September 2025.
-[Show full response](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/fox/live/#)
-### Natural England - 12 - Devon, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 8 September 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1307: / Line 1295: @@
  Thank you for your consultation dated 18 July 2025. Please find attached Natural England's formal statutory response.
-The consultee included the following files with their response:
+The consultee included the following files with their response:[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/MMO Consultation Response Fal Docks MLA 2025 00157 519879.pdf|MMO Consultation Response Fal Docks MLA 2025 00157 519879 (1).pdf]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MMO Consultation Response Fal Docks MLA 2025 00157 519879 (1).pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-MMO_PUBREG_CONTROL-download-file-ff/fyG0Is_o4vuPPDKc/file)
-### Crown Estate - Marine Estates
+==== Crown Estate - Marine Estates ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 1 August 2025.
+====  Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 1 August 2025. ====
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1323: / Line 1309: @@
  The Crown Estate is affected by the proposed disposal activity and landowner's consent is required. The applicant is requested to liaise with Mark Wrigley on 0207 851 5062, mark.wrigley@thecrownestate.co.uk regarding landowner's consent for the proposed disposal activity.
-### Duchy of Cornwall - Duchy of Cornwall -Western District
+==== Duchy of Cornwall - Duchy of Cornwall -Western District ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They haven't submitted a response yet.
-### Historic England - Dorset/Devon/Cornwall/Isles of Scilly/Somerset/Gloucestshire
+==== Historic England - Dorset/Devon/Cornwall/Isles of Scilly/Somerset/Gloucestshire ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 14 August 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 14 August 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1339: / Line 1325: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/PL00799418 Falmouth Docks Redevelopment HE advice on ML application 14082025.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-MMO_PUBREG_CONTROL-download-file-ff/fyG34w_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/PL00799418 Falmouth Docks Redevelopment HE advice on ML application 14082025.pdf|PL00799418 Falmouth Docks Redevelopment HE advice on ML application 14082025.pdf]]
-### Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities - Cornwall
+==== Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities - Cornwall ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 19 September 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 19 September 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1351: / Line 1337: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development Mr D Jones Final.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-MMO_PUBREG_CONTROL-download-file-ff/fyG35q_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development Mr D Jones Final.pdf|MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development Mr D Jones Final.pdf]]
-### Nat Federation of Fishermen's Organisations - Nat Federation of Fishermen's Organisations
+==== Nat Federation of Fishermen's Organisations - Nat Federation of Fishermen's Organisations ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They haven't submitted a response yet.
-### MMO Coastal Offices & MCT - South West Marine Area
+==== MMO Coastal Offices & MCT - South West Marine Area ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 29 August 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 29 August 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They didn't have any comments.
-### MMO Coastal Offices & MCT - Conservation Team
+==== MMO Coastal Offices & MCT - Conservation Team ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 1 September 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 1 September 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1383: / Line 1369: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Consultation response MLA202500157.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-MMO_PUBREG_CONTROL-download-file-ff/fyG36k_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/Consultation response MLA202500157.pdf|Consultation response MLA202500157.pdf]]
-### Trinity House - Trinity House
+==== Trinity House - Trinity House ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 3 September 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 3 September 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1405: / Line 1391: @@
  C. Bransby
-### Maritime and Coastguard Agency - Navigational Safety Branch
+==== Maritime and Coastguard Agency - Navigational Safety Branch ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 28 August 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 28 August 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1441: / Line 1427: @@
  UK Technical Services Navigation
-[Show full response](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/fox/live/#)
-### Royal Yachting Association - Royal Yachting Association
+==== Royal Yachting Association - Royal Yachting Association ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 8 September 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025. Responded on 8 September 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1451: / Line 1436: @@
  The RYA would like local clubs and recognised training centres to be kept informed of scheduled works to minimise impact on their activity. Location and contact details can be found at find.rya.org.uk
-### Royal Society for the Protection of Birds - South East
+==== Royal Society for the Protection of Birds - South East ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They haven't submitted a response yet.
-### Royal Society for the Protection of Birds - Dorset, Solent (Hampshire/Isle of Wight), East & West Sussex
+==== Royal Society for the Protection of Birds - Dorset, Solent (Hampshire/Isle of Wight), East & West Sussex ====
-### Consulted on 18 July 2025.
+Consulted on 18 July 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They haven't submitted a response yet.
-### Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - SEAL
+==== Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - SEAL ====
-### Consulted on 21 July 2025. Responded on 26 August 2025.
+Consulted on 21 July 2025. Responded on 26 August 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They didn't have any comments.
@@ Line 1471: / Line 1456: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20250815 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks ES Review UWN Advice FINAL.docx](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-MMO_PUBREG_CONTROL-download-file-ff/fyG37e_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/20250815 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks ES Review UWN Advice FINAL.pdf|20250815 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks ES Review UWN Advice FINAL.docx]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20250818 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development ES Review SEAL Advice FINAL.docx](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-MMO_PUBREG_CONTROL-download-file-ff/fyG387_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/20250818 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development ES Review SEAL Advice_FINAL.pdf|20250818 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development ES Review SEAL Advice_FINAL.docx]]
-### Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - Coastal Processes
+==== Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - Coastal Processes ====
-### Consulted on 18 August 2025. Responded on 22 August 2025.
+Consulted on 18 August 2025. Responded on 22 August 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1485: / Line 1470: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20250823 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks EIA CP advice KCQC.docx](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-MMO_PUBREG_CONTROL-download-file-ff/fyG392_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/20250823 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks EIA CP advice KCQC.pdf|20250823 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks EIA CP advice KCQC.docx]]
-### Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - Underwater Noise
+==== Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - Underwater Noise ====
-### Consulted on 15 August 2025.
+Consulted on 15 August 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They haven't submitted a response yet.
-### Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - Benthic Construction
+==== Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science - Benthic Construction ====
-### Consulted on 21 July 2025. Responded on 11 August 2025.
+Consulted on 21 July 2025. Responded on 11 August 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They responded:
@@ Line 1509: / Line 1494: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20250804 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks ES Benthic Ecology KCQC.docx](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-MMO_PUBREG_CONTROL-download-file-ff/fyG39W_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/20250804 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks ES Benthic Ecology KCQC.pdf|20250804 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks ES Benthic Ecology KCQC.docx]]
-### Cornwall Coastal Partnership - Coastal Partnership
+==== Cornwall Coastal Partnership - Coastal Partnership ====
-### Consulted on 23 July 2025.
+Consulted on 23 July 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on this case. They haven't submitted a response yet.
+===== Document Consultation Responses =====
+==== EA (Devon and Cornwall) ====
-Document Consultation Responses
+==== Piling Restrictions   ====
-### EA (Devon and Cornwall)
-### Piling Restrictions
 Consulted on 15 July 2026. Responded on 13 August 2026.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on these documents:
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/20260714_Applicant-Comments-EA-Piling.pdf|20260714_Applicant-Comments-EA-Piling.pdf]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20260714 Applicant-Comments-EA-Piling.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyG5Ag_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/FW  MLA 2025 00157 - EA response - Piling Restrictions - Further Queries - Falmouth Docks.pdf|FW  MLA 2025 00157 - EA response - Piling Restrictions - Further Queries - Falmouth Docks.msg]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/FW  MLA 2025 00157 - EA response - Piling Restrictions - Further Queries - Falmouth Docks.msg](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyG5B1_o4vuPPDKc/file)
 They responded:
@@ Line 1539: / Line 1520: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Response 07-08-2026.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyG5Ca_o4vuPPDKc/file)
-### NE (12 - Devon, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/Response 07-08-2026.pdf|Response 07-08-2026.pdf]]
-### Falmouth SAC AA Addendum April 2026
+==== NE (12 - Devon, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly) ====
+==== Falmouth SAC AA Addendum April 2026   ====
 Consulted on 28 April 2026. Responded on 20 May 2026.
-The consultee was asked for their comments on [Falmouth SAC AA Addendum April 2026.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyG8ll_o4vuPPDKc/file) . They responded:
+The consultee was asked for their comments on [[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_April_2026.pdf|Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_April_2026.pdf]]. They responded:
- Dear Yvonne,
+Dear Yvonne,
- Apologies for the delay in responding. Please find Natural England's advice letter attached.
+Apologies for the delay in responding. Please find Natural England's advice letter attached.
- Kind regards,
+Kind regards,
- Kate
+Kate
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MMO Consultation Response Fal Docks MLA 2025 00157 547218 20.05.26.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyG8mu_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/MMO Consultation Response Fal Docks MLA 2025 00157 547218 20.05.26.pdf|MMO Consultation Response Fal Docks MLA 2025 00157 547218 20.05.26.pdf]]
-### CEFAS (SEAL)
+==== CEFAS (SEAL) ====
-### Consulted on 9 April 2026. Responded on 1 May 2026.
+Consulted on 9 April 2026. Responded on 1 May 2026.
-The consultee was asked for their comments on [ES Vol1 Ch10 Commercial Fisheries and Shellfisheries 02.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyG8w6_o4vuPPDKc/file) . They haven't submitted a response yet.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on [[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf]]. They haven't submitted a response yet.
-### Shellfish Advice
+==== Shellfish Advice ====
-### Consulted on 9 April 2026. Responded on 27 April 2026.
+Consulted on 9 April 2026. Responded on 27 April 2026.
-The consultee was asked for their comments on [ES Vol1 Ch10 Commercial Fisheries and Shellfisheries 02.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyG8w6_o4vuPPDKc/file) . They responded:
+The consultee was asked for their comments on [[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf]]. They responded:
  Good morning,
@@ Line 1583: / Line 1564: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Construction and Demolition of Infrastructure Shellfish Advice Final.docx](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGaSM_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Construction and Demolition of Infrastructure Shellfish Advice Final.pdf|MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Construction and Demolition of Infrastructure Shellfish Advice Final.docx]]
-### CEFAS (SEAL)
+==== CEFAS (SEAL) ====
-### Consulted on 14 November 2025. Responded on 8 December 2025.
+Consulted on 14 November 2025. Responded on 8 December 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on these documents:
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_13102025.pdf|Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_13102025.pdf]]
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/Falmouth_SPA_AA_Addendum.pdf|Falmouth_SPA_AA_Addendum.pdf]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth SAC AA Addendum 13102025.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGdgj_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/Natural-England-questions-for-Cefas.pdf|Natural-England-questions-for-Cefas.docx]]
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017_HRA.pdf|15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017_HRA.pdf]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth SPA AA Addendum.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGdh4_o4vuPPDKc/file)
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157 Natural-England-questions-for-Cefas.docx](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGdhP_o4vuPPDKc/file)
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/15743-RAM-FD-SW-RP-EV-00017 HRA.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGdiA_o4vuPPDKc/file)
 They responded:
- Please find my comments attached.
+Please find my comments attached.
-The consultee included the following files with their response:
+The consultee included the following files with their response: [[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/20251124 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development- Natural England further questions SEAL Advice FINAL.pdf|20251124 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development- Natural England further questions SEAL Advice FINAL.docx]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/20251124 MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Development- Natural England further questions SEAL Advice FINAL.docx](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGdjJ_o4vuPPDKc/file)
-### NE (12 - Devon, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly)
+==== NE (12 - Devon, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly) ====
-### Consulted on 17 October 2025. Responded on 26 November 2025.
+Consulted on 17 October 2025. Responded on 26 November 2025.
 The consultee was asked for their comments on these documents:
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_13102025.pdf|Falmouth_SAC_AA_Addendum_13102025.pdf]]
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/Falmouth_SPA_AA_Addendum.pdf|Falmouth_SPA_AA_Addendum.pdf]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth SAC AA Addendum 13102025.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGhFD_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/MMO_Consultation_Response_Fal Docks MLA_2025_00157 519879.pdf|MMO_Consultation_Response_Fal Docks MLA_2025_00157 519879.pdf]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/Falmouth SPA AA Addendum.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGhGo_o4vuPPDKc/file)
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MMO Consultation Response Fal Docks MLA 2025 00157 519879 (1).pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGhH9_o4vuPPDKc/file)
 They responded:
@@ Line 1635: / Line 1614: @@
  Natural England
-### CEFAS (SEAL)
-### Consulted on 28 August 2025. Responded on 3 October 2025.
+==== CEFAS (SEAL) ====
-The consultee was asked for their comments on [ES Vol1 Ch10 Commercial Fisheries and Shellfisheries 02.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGjdW_o4vuPPDKc/file) . They didn't have any comments.
+Consulted on 28 August 2025. Responded on 3 October 2025.
-### Shellfish Advice
+The consultee was asked for their comments on [[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf]]. They didn't have any comments.
-### Consulted on 28 August 2025. Responded on 2 October 2025.
+==== Shellfish Advice ====
-The consultee was asked for their comments on [ES Vol1 Ch10 Commercial Fisheries and Shellfisheries 02.pdf](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGjdW_o4vuPPDKc/file) . They responded:
+Consulted on 28 August 2025. Responded on 2 October 2025.
+The consultee was asked for their comments on [[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf|ES_Vol1_Ch10_Commercial_Fisheries_and_Shellfisheries_02.pdf]]. They responded:
  Good afternoon,
@@ Line 1656: / Line 1636: @@
 The consultee included the following files with their response:
+[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Consultations/MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Redevelopment  Shellfish Advice  Final.pdf|MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Redevelopment  Shellfish Advice  Final.docx]]
-|[[https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/Additional Documents/MLA202500157 Falmouth Docks Redevelopment  Shellfish Advice  Final.docx](https://marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk/mmofox5/download/action/3ql5tlf91ih4fjpi2knn3pmr13sa6k9ue7t9icmq7c133f8ermqb5qgh7ct16bqbvto7knhtffvh169j7b1hquegr0iph19op3ev/action-download-file/fyGjfs_o4vuPPDKc/file)
+===== Sediment Sampling =====
+{{url>https://steps39.github.io/SedDataExp/SedimentDataExplorer.html?status=https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/250903MLA202500157-Falmouth-MinimalLabels.sde&shapes=https://northeastfc.uk/AroundUK/Planning/MLA_2025_00157/MLA_2025_00157-LOCATIONS.kml&selcharts=physicaldata,tracemetaldata,pahdata,pcbdata,bdedata,organotinsdata,organochlorinedata&subcharts=samplegroup,chemicalgroup,gorhamtest,totalhc,pahratios,ringfractions,eparatios,simpleratios,congenertest,pcanormalise,pcalmw,pcahmw,pcaepa,pcasmallpts,pcaorganiccarbon,splitbyweight,splitbyarea,totalsolidsandtotalcarbon,cumulative&sort=none 100%,6000}}
+===== Other Pages That Link To This Page =====
+{{backlinks>.}}