river_tees_contamination_excluded_areas_and_sampling
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| river_tees_contamination_excluded_areas_and_sampling [2026/09/07 23:15] – [MLA/2025/00263] nefcadmin | river_tees_contamination_excluded_areas_and_sampling [2026/09/08 10:34] (current) – [Other Pages That Link To This Page] nefcadmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== | + | ====== Contamination, |
| ===== MLA/ | ===== MLA/ | ||
| PD Ports marine licence application [[MLA-2025-00263|MLA/ | PD Ports marine licence application [[MLA-2025-00263|MLA/ | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ : | ||
| - | |||
| - | ^Dredge Parameter^Value^ | ||
| - | |Total dredged area of the River Tees|1162.37Ha| | ||
| - | |Total excluded area from dredging|10.61Ha| | ||
| - | |% of total dredged area excluded|0.91%| | ||
| - | |Area of smallest excluded area|0.8Ha| | ||
| - | |% of total dredged area made up by smallest excluded area|0.07%| | ||
| - | |Number of times smallest excluded area fits into total dredge area|1453| | ||
| The licence was granted with just 27(31 if 4 are included for Hartlepool) samples taken over the whole 1162.37Ha area, meaning that there was only **1 sample for every 43.05Ha** or **1 sample for every 62 football pitches**. | The licence was granted with just 27(31 if 4 are included for Hartlepool) samples taken over the whole 1162.37Ha area, meaning that there was only **1 sample for every 43.05Ha** or **1 sample for every 62 football pitches**. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 18: | ||
| The table above just drives home that 27 samples would have been drastically insufficient to be able to detect the current excluded areas and as such will not be able to detect similar currently unknown highly toxic areas within the total dredge area. | The table above just drives home that 27 samples would have been drastically insufficient to be able to detect the current excluded areas and as such will not be able to detect similar currently unknown highly toxic areas within the total dredge area. | ||
| - | The number of times an area fits into the total dredge area is dramatic, for the smallest excluded area of 0.8Ha it fits 1452 times. | + | The number of times an area fits into the total dredge area is dramatic, for the smallest excluded area of 0.8Ha it fits 1453 times. |
| 4,600 samples is the maximum number for the river and in fact by using knowledge of the river the number of samples necessary can be reduced considerably but not to 27. | 4,600 samples is the maximum number for the river and in fact by using knowledge of the river the number of samples necessary can be reduced considerably but not to 27. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 25: | ||
| The OSPAR guidance states that both spatial and volumetric representation must be achieved. | The OSPAR guidance states that both spatial and volumetric representation must be achieved. | ||
| + | |||
| ===== MLA/ | ===== MLA/ | ||
| Line 50: | Line 41: | ||
| [[River Tees Contamination, | [[River Tees Contamination, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Other Pages That Link To This Page ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{backlinks> | ||
river_tees_contamination_excluded_areas_and_sampling.1788822925.txt.gz · Last modified: by nefcadmin
